Tuesday, November 21, 2006




Better late than never... A recommendation to check out the trailer for this Documentary movie about the Dixie Chicks called 'Shut up and Sing. Click on the image to visit IMDB.com

Monday, November 20, 2006

Save the Julia Richman Educational Complex

*Updated 11-20
Regarding the city's planned demolition of the Julia Richman Educational Complex, a group of 6 small schools occupying half a city block on 68th and 2nd Avenue (right near me- picture to come) and the NYC Department of Education's plans to hand the choice real estate over to Hunter College because Hunter just can't seem to figure out how to bus its college students from one part of the city to another:

...As JRECs website is reporting, Hunter College wants to take over the Complex, tear it down and dislocate its six schools to a brand new site on 25th Street and the East River so that it can build a 'state of the art' science center and a new CUNY Graduate School of Public Health. Science students and researchers and faculty would benefit tremendously with being in a facility adjacent to the main Hunter Campus," says college spokesperson Merideth Halpern. For heaven's sakes.. stop the whining.

All I have to say is they pay spokespersons way too much to say something that baseless, weak and unsupportable. Look at any great college or university and you will find its undergraduates located separately from its teaching hospitals... should I make the list for you, Joel Klein and Jamie Smarr? Start with 2 of the city's largest teaching hospitals: NYU and Columbia and work your way on Upstate. Goodness, Cornell University is located hundreds of miles away from one of its flagship teaching hospitals Weill Cornell, located right here in NYC. Give us all a break.

Parents and their children at JREC are begging you to please, stop the whining Hunter College and start the teaching... in your own facility on 25th Street at the East River. Shall I help you locate the hospitals in your property's own back yard that can mentor your students? Do you need the city's residents to take up a collection for MetroCards for the students who need to travel a few miles downtown or can you simply use the millions of dollars you'd be saving on not demolishing a perfectly good newly renovated building to get yourself a few buses... No? I didn't think so. Better to displace a group of elementary, middle and high school children than College bound adults.

Thank you Juan Gonzalez of the NY Daily News, for an article titled 'City's Bad Lesson on Revitalized Schools' originally published on November 15, 2006. As Gonzalez writes, the newly refurbished/renovated/and rehabilitated Julia Richman Educational Complex has become "a national model for urban educational reform, and experts flocked there from all over America to study its methods." (In fact, the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation has spent its own funds to support and promote the success of these small schools.)

The 6 small schools have been lovingly brought back to life and higher educational standards with a great deal of sweat equity on the part of the building's 6 Principals, spearheaded by Ann Cook and a team of dedicated teachers and administrators hell bent on promoting the school's reputation for excellence. They are touting the need for JREC to stay just where it is. As many other small schools that have worked similar magic will tell you, the building works because the building works. I will show you gorgeous newly built schools in parts of the Bronx where the paint isn't dry that are struggling to make their schools work half as well as JREC. Any one of these educators will tell you it simply isn't how new the building is, but how its special characteristics have blended to create the total effect. Jamie Smarr, shame on you for saying a new building will solve all their problems... Juan Gonzalez asks the quite reasonable question:

"what has been the response of Schools Chancellor Joel Klein to one of his system's biggest success stories? Demolish it." Gonzalez explaines how JRECs administration feels about this dislocation: "Relocating their students more than 2 miles away from their current site will destroy the close relationship their small schools have nurtured with the local community. Even worse, they say school officials, in typical Bloomberg-administration style, never asked their opinion on the sale and demolition of their schools."

Surprise, surprise. The City not being forthcoming about its plans.

*However, I'm very curious as to where the Daily News writers got their information about the amount of money spent to renovate the Complex printed in this article from the November 16th edition of the Daily News which says the city spent $15 million on renovations and the school officials and neighborhood groups fighting the destruction of this school have been reporting on their website that $30 - million that is --- was spent on it. As this is a pretty huge discrepancy I'm wondering where they got their facts...? ("Critics railed yesterday against plans to tear down an upper East Side school that's undergone $15 million in renovations as officials defended plans to put up a college science center on the site.") I'm assuming they mean 'rallied.' (*Update from the Daily News reporters Jimmy Vielkind and Erin Einhorn that the $30 million figure might include money spent before 1995, ie, they state "it might be more inclusive. Erin Einhorn, the other reporter, said she got that number from the department of education and it goes only to 1995.")

Check out the quote where Jamie Smarr in typical DOE sellout fashion is saying that "the school will continue to require to have maintenance issues..." that school was practically rebuilt over a period of years not months, and now they say that building will be at no cost to the taxpayers. What about a tear down of a perfectly good building? This is no Yankee-Shea stadium (take your pick). City officials are going to surely deceive their way into getting this project covered...one way or the other. They just don't have a leg to stand on other than to bully the school out of existence.

Never mind they are completely ignoring the statistics which clearly indicate that thousands of new apartments are being built here on the East Side alone within the next 3-5 years. Forget about 7 years from now, where are these children supposed to go? Shall we say every one of them will be going to private school? Taking away a building that is suitable for 1,700 children that is now in top condition for the next 50 years is short sighted to say the least.

Decide for yourself if the Department of Education is being up front about their plans. The DOE continues to say its not a 'done deal' ...The woman in my video (being edited at this time- up real soon) attended a meeting where the Chancellor says otherwise.

Read the Daily News article referenced above, and this article from the NY Times written on June 28th

As background:
This is off of a flyer available on the Save JREC website:
Why spend $150 million dollars to simply replace a sound educational building?
Hunter College could build the facilities it needs on the land it already controls at
25th street, without also building a replacement for the Julia Richman Schools.
• Isn’t it better for Hunter College to locate its health sciences facilities near its
affiliated hospitals downtown?
• Nearly $30 million dollars of public money has just been spent to renovate the
Julia Richman Education Complex. This is not just “any old building.” It is a
sound structure that has been carefully and thoughtfully renovated to meet the
needs of its occupants.
• JREC is the jewel in the crown of educational reform. It is nationally recognized
example of how to redesign a large school building to house a complex of small
schools and supporting services. There is a constant flow of visitors from across
the nation and abroad to study this educational model.
• Ella Baker Elementary School (PreK-8th grade) at JREC serves the children of
workers at Hunter College and the nearby hospitals. Moving this school
downtown would hurt Hunter College staff and remove this strong educational
option for many families working in the area.
• Neighborhood institutions, such as Mount Sinai Hospital, the Neighborhood
Coalition for Shelter, the Burden Center for the Elderly, and Manhattan Eye and
Ear Hospital, provide services to and internship possibilities for JREC students.
Engagement with this community is part of the success of these schools.
• It is particularly unethical for a sister institution to evict a successful education
complex simply to meet its own real estate desires.

NY Protest site
The Essential Blog- small schools
For more on this story Mike Klonsky

Monday, November 13, 2006

Film 14


Not created by myself but my daughter Sara and her friends who made this in 24 hours. This is simply entitled 'Film 14'



Start time: 4:25 PM EST
October 3, 2006
Creators: Adam Blumenberg, Anthony Jones, Conor Stratton, Sara Vogel, Zander Eckhouse

Rules:
1. Everyone be involved must appear on screen at least once
2. No breaks longer than 20 minutes
3. Must have exotic location
4. No time travelling
5. Must pay attention to lighting
6. Must be made in less than 24 hours.
Warning: liberal use of blood and pseudo violence

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Few Surprises Mark Local Elections - News

Few Surprises Mark Local Elections - News

My favorite city reporter

Sweet Caroline, Rummy's gone and the Senate is now ours




Dedicated to George W. Bush who's a lame duck, Cheney who is now but an afterthought in the Senate and 'the Donald' who is on the unemployment line


Where it began, I can't begin to know when
But then I know it's growing strong
Oh, wasn't the spring, whooo
And spring became the summer
Who'd believe It'd take so long

Hands, touching hands, reaching out
Touching me, touching you
Oh, sweet Caroline
Good times never seem so good
I've been inclined
da da dah
to believe it never would

And now I, I look at the night, whooo
And it don't seem so lonely
We fill it up with only two, oh
And when I hurt
Hurting runs off my shoulder
How can I hurt when holding you

Oh, one, touching one, reaching out
Touching me, touching you
Oh, sweet Caroline
da da dah
Good times never seem so good
Oh I've been inclined to believe it never would

Ohhh, sweet Caroline, good times never seem so good

Tuesday, November 07, 2006

A party for the party

234-291 I'm positively giddy. Did we speak loudly enough and can you say 'lame duck?'
...and oooh...

Rumsfeld Resigns as Defense Secretary After Big Election Gains for Democrats
Did I say giddy? whats better than giddy to describe this?
Yes, MoveOn.org says it best...
Sherrod Brown—who read MoveOn petitions on Iraq on the House floor—is the new Senator from the formerly red state of Ohio. Richard Pombo, who led a crusade to kill the Endangered Species Act and called the Environmental Protection Agency "jackbooted thugs," is out of a job. The abortion ban in South Dakota failed. Laws to raise the minimum wage passed. And with a historic sweep of 28 (and counting!) seats, Nancy Pelosi is now the first woman Speaker of a Democratic House.

Monday, November 06, 2006

Election Day

Election day is tomorrow; get out there and vote.
Find out who's running and learn more about the person you are casting your ballot for at the League of Women's Voters...In NY State, find your local ballot here
Tell us about your Voting Experience!
Make sure YOUR voice is heard on Election Day and tell us about your voting experience by taking this survey.

Another stolen election article: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in Rolling Stone Magazine

From FAIR: http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=22&media_view_id=8043
Democracy Now!: Hacking Democracy (10/31/06) by Amy GoodmanGoodman speaks of "widespread reports of malfunctions and security lapses" in the electronic voting machines recording "80 percent of the votes cast in America today," with Maryland's governor "call[ing] for the state to scrap its electronic voting system and revert to paper ballots," along with a major report about "17 states nationwide whose voting system is at 'high risk' for a compromised election." Yet investigative reporter Bev Harris explains that
one of the things we found in 2004 is that terrible things happen in elections, and if you come back and tell a story about it, it’s very difficult to enact change, it’s very difficult to get the media to cover it.
Harris' solution: make her own documentary "to get evidence in the form that it can't be spun or explained away."

2006 NYC Marathon

Sunday morning early, my husband and I peeked outside our terrace and saw the lead wheelchair racers from the 2006 NYC Marathon. Only minutes before we had seen them on TV racing over the Queensboro Bridge. We went down to view from the corner of 68th and 1st Ave just in time to see the front runners for the women (I took a snapshot of Jelena Prokopcuka repeated as the New York City Marathon champion. According to the official Marathon website she is the sixth woman in the history of the race to achieve this feat). The race had 37, 954 finishers, the most ever. We even caught a peek at Lance Armstrong flying past us on 1st Avenue. (see if you can pin him out in my vid). We took a hike on over to Central Park to see the finish. While we couldn't get close enough to the finish line to see them cross, we hung out in the park just past Tavern on the Green, their final stop. Here's our day!
-alyson
Formats available: Windows Media (.wmv)

This video was originally shared on blip.tv by sloperaly with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license.

Hacking Democracy

Who said YouTube was filled with useless cat dancing videos?
Hacking Democracy
The controversial HBO documentary on e-voting, Diebold, and stealing votes. Part 9 may have been taken down by now.

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtPiGIqSljE
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwBGgoLcTuU
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilq-KoQUMRw
Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPFUNYtvg5M
Part 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-az3g0jgNqM
Part 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3BtLxH5ACk
Part 7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUVfovXfw4o
Part 8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Juvpik8ks
Part 9: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOxFUevvP6M

It didn't end there...Princeton's memory card test: Princeton scientists Hack Diebold
The full paper here on Princeton's site: Security Analysis of the Diebold AccuVote-TS Voting Machine

Sunday, November 05, 2006

Friday, November 03, 2006

Third-Party Candidates Vie for State Recognition - Election

Third-Party Candidates Vie for State Recognition - Election
Here is the third in the election series... does this girl ever sleep anymore? Who is her mother?

the Rent is Too High Party... hmmm... I want him for governor

Albany Democrats Expect to Gain Seats - Election

Albany Democrats Expect to Gain Seats - Election Sara had her share of this week's spectator Special Election section... use this as a handy reference guide on election day when you walk into the poll...

Dahroug Back on the Trail - News

Dahroug Back on the Trail - News

Here is some crack election day reporting from the Jimmy Olsen of the Vogel Family...Article in Columbia Spectator, November 2, 2006 by Sara Vogel

Post Happy Halloween Post


Happy Post Halloween!
We had a frightful halloween eve preparing for Sara's not-birthday-yet-halloween-cupcake-decorating-why-decorate-cupcakes-we-are-college-students-ferchrissakes! party.
Everyone allowed me the liberty of kitsching it up as if I were celebrating Halloween for a nine year old instead of a nineteen year old! Lots of Orange junk food and I had a blast. Jillian narrates the scene set in this video....wooohhhh!

Blog entry ideas:

http://www.frankwbaker.com/isbwar.htm

On Photo fraud- very cool

Sound effects
http://ljudo.com
lexicon of cell phones. Share yours

lexicon of cell phones to share: add some of your own

> Texting (and Messaging)
> Bluetooth
> V-Cast
> WAP Internet
> Get It Now
> Camera phone
> Built in MP3 player
> Wallpapers
> Games
> Walkie Talkie phones

> ring tones
> roaming (isn't this about buffaloes?)
> roll over minutes
> coverage area
> cell tower
> dropped calls
> smart phones (do stupid phones exist)

YouTube as social mediation

My response to an earlier post by R.R. While I usually respect R.M. 's opinions highly, because we don't have enough evidence doesn't mean that something pro social is not happening on YouTube. On the contrary. I believe when I see a particular video downloaded a thousand times that something highly social is going on... its up to the academics to figure out exactly the 'what' part of it, but I'd hazard a guess that individuals have a tendency to want to think and create in groups and whether they do it in person or with and through the media, they are engaged in highly beneficial activities... (this could be my future doctoral project in the making...)

Well, I found someone on my media listserve would agree with me that nothing is not necessarily not nothing. Ms. A. P. wrote the following on the listserve: "Granted, people who make videos of their cats and post to YouTube may not have "academic" knowledge of media literacy, but the fact that they've gone through the video-making process, and the uploading process, means that they probably do know at least a little bit about media. And hopefully that knowledge will give them insight into media that is produced by other folks. My opinion -- YouTube rocks. Sure, there's a lot of crap on there. But, for the most part, it's crap created by people in their livingrooms/classrooms/ wherever, and not stuff created by someone who had to test market first. Oh -- and there's also a lot of great stuff on YouTube as well. We should celebrate that people are getting off the couch to actually make media -- isn't that a big part of what media literacy is all about?" That was written at 12:37AM on a Sunday night and interestingly enough K.M. (a frequent poster on that listserve) wrote this back to her a scant 9 minutes later: "I think production *is* important to ML---but 'production literacy' doesn't mean 'content literacy' (analysis, understanding advertising techniques, etc...)."

I'd tend to agree with Ms. K. M. in that if people are invested in taking the time to learn to produce media usually they learn how to do it by themselves. They are conscious 'producers' of the media but are not necessarily conscious (and by this I mean 'aware') of the factors that contribute to audience reaction behind that production. For example, unless someone is told that when a camera is placed 'higher' than the subject, the shot takes on a subliminal suggestion of powerlessness or inferiority or that cameras placed lower than the subject projects the subject in a superior manner, this POV or point-of-view effect will have been lost on the producer. You frequently see this style used in home videos because the camera operator has not been taught the proper techniques of shooting, not because they are looking to do it to create that feeling in the mind of the audience. If the producer of the video is aware of the conventions of that media, one being POV and uses that and other techniques in the process purposefully, then there can be insight. That is what I believe can be taught to kids as young as preschool so that media becomes a place for them to express themselves purposefully.

YouTube as high culture?

Earlier last week a well respected media literacy expert Rob M. wrote his dissention about YouTubetongue-in-cheek to my media literacy listserve:
"This is sort of an odd assumption, friends -
That shooting and editing video of my dancing cat and then uploading it
to the You Tube mayhem/web constitutes "media literacy."

But heck, what do I know...
My Space and Google-Tube me,

Rob"

He had also responded to several other media literacy educators who wrote in to say they don't own cell phones and cable tv:

"I find it interesting that you and Frank are talking about a major way
that you decrease your time spent with less personal, less human
contact with others--cell phones, i.e., maximizing what Bill McK.
last week in VT called "healthy natural human interaction."
Meanwhile, Henry Jenkins and his funders at Microsoft are talking
about more ways to provide kids with more time to be spent with
screens. It is interesting because we have no solid evidence that such
media production accomplishes anything pro-social, whereas much
empirical data suggests that working in well designed, small groups on
beneficial projects does wonderful things for people."

While I usually respect R.M. 's opinions highly, because we don't have enough evidence doesn't mean that something pro social is not happening on YouTube. On the contrary. I believe when I see a particular video downloaded a thousand times that something highly social is going on... its up to the academics to figure out exactly the 'what' part of it, but I'd hazard a guess that individuals have a tendency to want to think and create in groups and whether they do it in person or with and through the media, they are engaged in highly beneficial activities... (this could be my future doctoral project in the making...)
Earlier last week I wrote that my posts would be about nothing. Not entirely, just close. My varied interests brought me to video blogging, because from my 18 years working in media at NBC I'd had enough and wanted to exercise my brain a little more. I pretty much did a 180 career-wise and decided to teach using media.

I left television to Direct a project of my own creation called the Video-Link Media Center for the New York City DOE School District 10. A major component was a teacher media-literacy based production and training program that I developed using original curricula to train over one hundred educators from within the school district on all phases of multimedia instruction for K-12. Since then, while I've left the public school forum and have gotten into higher education, I stayed up with public use of media because its so much a part of my interest and because I'd love to see higher education 'catch up' with the kids who have now overcome the educators in their use of media. In the case of both my kids, they use it far more than me and are getting savvier about getting to what they want.